Dear Colleagues,
As we revisit the Open Data policy, I thought it would be a good opportunity to check in on other high-performing housing finance organizations to see how they handle sharing information with the public.
As a refresher, I've attached the proposed initial data inventory from my resolution draft at the end of this message. The list falls into two broad categories: (1) existing documents that just need to be organized and consistently placed in the same web location (e.g. our audits) and (2) machine-readable data that we commit to update on a policy-based tempo (e.g. our property portfolio's information).
Presently, we already share many of the items covered under (1) on our website (Board materials, budgets, audits). We just don't do it based on a formal policy that creates firm expectations of what exactly will be shared and when. For example, I couldn't easily find our adopted budgets online. One can eventually find proposed versions of them via a search of our Board meetings. But that doesn't seem very user-friendly or at the level of transparency we aim for. Unsurprisingly, many of our peer agencies (PHAs, HFAs, HFCs) in Texas and across the nation have extensive online collections of basic documents, reports, and even performance dashboards.
I don't think we need to match everything these entities put online, but we just have to do a good job at what we deem truly matters to Travis County residents.
As for (2), right now, we don't seem to share any machine-readable data. The draft's starter inventory only has 3 requirements for machine-readable data that represent novel work (KPIs CSV, revenue forecast CSV, and the portfolio database). The last is probably the most important and the most work in the starter set.
Locally, the Austin Housing Finance Corporation (AHFC) has a detailed "Affordable Housing Inventory" with 2,426 rows and 52 columns as of this writing. You can view it at:
https://data.austintexas.gov/Housing-and-Real-Estate/Affordable-Housing-Inventory/ifzc-3xz8/about_data
The DC Housing Finance Agency (DCHFA) offers an example outside of our region. I am emphasizing DCHFA because, like SHFC, it operates much more like a public enterprise than a conventional government department and it has an appointed Board. DCHFA publishes a property-level Housing Finance Agency Portfolio. You can view the data set's page at:
https://opendata.dc.gov/datasets/DCGIS%3A%3Ahousing-finance-agency-portfolio/about
Both AHFC and DCHFA get to piggyback on the open data portals of their municipal governments. Travis County does have an open data portal. But hosting our own data sets may be more efficient since we will likely start with simple CSVs.
To conclude, I think the current state of peer practice supports developing a consistent policy on important documents and machine-readable data. On the latter, a thoughtful release of portfolio data appears to be the product with the most proven appeal.
JGA
APPENDIX - Proposed Data Inventory from 2025 draft policy
BOARD MATERIALS — Version-controlled board packet — PDF — Real-time upon distribution
BOARD MATERIALS — Meeting agenda — PDF — Real-time upon distribution
BOARD MATERIALS — Meeting minutes — PDF — Real-time upon adoption
BOARD MATERIALS — Video recordings — URL — Monthly
FINANCIAL — Proposed Budget — PDF + CSV — Real-time upon distribution
FINANCIAL — Adopted Budget — PDF + CSV — Real-time upon adoption
FINANCIAL — Amended Budget — PDF + CSV — Real-time upon adoption
FINANCIAL — Audit — PDF — Annually
FINANCIAL — Monthly Financial Report to the Board — PDF — Monthly
FINANCIAL — Annual Revenue Forecast — PDF + CSV — Annual
OPERATIONAL — KPI Database — CSV — Annual
OPERATIONAL — Property Database — CSV — Bi-Annual
ORGANIZATION — Organizational Chart — PDF — Annual
ORGANIZATION — Committee Assignments — PDF — Real-time upon change
POLICY — Key Board Resolutions — ODT — Real-time upon adoption
POLICY — Enterprise Policies — ODT — Real-time upon adoption